Oakley Sizing Chart
|XS||0||31.5" / 80cm||23" / 58cm||34" / 86cm|
|2||32.5" / 83cm||24" / 61cm||35" / 89cm|
|S||4||33.5" / 85cm||25" / 63cm||36" / 91cm|
|6||34.5" / 88cm||26" / 66cm||37" / 94cm|
|M||8||35.5" / 90cm||27" / 69cm||38" / 97cm|
|10||36.5" / 93cm||28" / 71cm||39" / 99cm|
|L||12||38" / 97cm||29.5" / 75cm||40.5" / 103cm|
|XL||14||39.5" / 100cm||31" / 79cm||42" / 107cm|
|HEIGHT||5'6"-5'10" / 168-178cm : ALL SIZES|
3 out of 3
Not the pants described...
January 18, 2011
While the pants that showed up are labeled "Intent" and are by Oakley, they are very different from what was described here on Altrec. The first thing I saw when I opened the package was that the "Black" pants I ordered were black with white pin-stripes. Very odd looking. Not at all what I wanted, but survivable. Unfortunately, the size was WAY off as well. I held them up to me and was astounded by the length of the pants. Once on it was hilarious. The waist fit perfect, exactly as described, but the legs were literally 6 inches too long. I'm not a short guy (6'3" 185lbs) and the 33" inseam that the size chart specifies is my normal inseam. These pants completely covered my feet. My toes were sticking out of the ends of the legs. The inseam has to be at least 38". The construction looks great. They're supposedly super waterproof and breathable. I really wanted to like these but they just don't fit or look as described. Additionally, for reference, the knee areas are very slim, so even though these aren't fully lined, it will be difficult wearing other pants underneath. Knee and butt insulation looks great, pockets are so-so, waist fit is spot on but I had to return them. I feel like Altrec could have caught the pin-stripe problem but there's no way they could have known about the 38" inseam. Great place to shop but these weren't good pants for me.Pros: Build quality, Cons: Bad design, don't match size chart
Available sizes, while supplies last, include size and size extra extra large: xxl, .